services insights news about nielsen careers
 
Multi-Cultural Marketing in the U.S.:
Shifting Ethnic Populations
By: Doug Anderson, EVP, Research & Development, Nielsen Consumer Panel Services
Print article.
Email to a friend
CI SUMMARY: New demographic projections released by the U.S. Census Bureau and by the Pew Research Center paint a portrait of the future United States as much different from what we see today—a multi-cultural country without a dominant ethnic group, and one increasingly split between young, growing ethnic populations and an aging white population. The biggest story is the growth in persons of Hispanic origin and other immigrant groups and their importance to population growth for the entire country.

Ethnic populations are generally defined in opposition to non-Hispanic whites—long the dominant ethnic group in the U.S. However, non-Hispanic whites dropped below 70% of the population in the 2000 Census and their share will decline rapidly over the coming decades. Sometime shortly after 2040, non-Hispanic whites will fall below the majority (50%) line. The table below traces the growth in ethnic population shares based on the Census Bureau projections.

In contrast to much of U.S. history, immigrants no longer come from Europe, but mostly from Latin America and Asia. Both the Pew and the Census Bureau projections assume this will continue, and given the rapidly aging populations of most of Europe, this seems a safe assumption. The combination of little or no non-Hispanic white immigration, the lowest fertility rates of any group, and a substantially older population, means that non-Hispanic whites will, by and large, not grow in absolute numbers for the projectable future and will shrink as a share of total U.S. population. In the Census Bureau projections, the absolute numbers of non-Hispanic whites actually fall after 2030 as seen in the chart below.

Hispanics and Asians are projected to grow strongly in the U.S...

Generational trends matter
Both Hispanics and Asians are projected to grow strongly in the U.S. from ongoing immigration and fertility rates that are higher than the native population. Hispanics alone will account for 60% of total population growth in the U.S. between 2005 and 2050, with about three quarters of that coming from new immigrants and their children and one quarter coming from children of Hispanics already in the country by 2005.

Generational trends will make for big changes in the composition of the Hispanic population in the U.S. As the chart below shows, the majority of U.S. Hispanics in 1960 were third generation or higher residents (both parents born in the U.S., perhaps even all grandparents). Only about 14% were first generation (i.e., foreign born). By 2005, Latino immigration had turned the tables and 40% were foreign born. Over the coming decades, second (U.S. born with at least one immigrant parent) and third generation Hispanics will grow at the expense of the foreign born.

Reaching the Asian community
Asians will grow almost as fast as Hispanics on a percentage basis, almost tripling by 2050. Growth for Asians will be even more dependent on new immigrants than growth for Hispanics will be, with new arrivals after 2005 and their children accounting for 94% of overall growth in the U.S. Asian population. A lower fertility rate among Asians is the main reason that Asians in the U.S. before 2005 do not account for a larger share of growth.

Asians will be more closely tied to their native cultures than will be Hispanics...

Although Asians will be substantially smaller in numbers and share (9% of total in 2050 in the Pew projections) than Hispanics, they will be more closely tied to their native cultures than will be Hispanics, most of whom will have been born in the U.S. and will have native English language skills. For marketers, Asian growth is much more of a challenge than Hispanic growth simply because the mix of cultures and languages is much wider.

Finding common ground between Indian and Chinese immigrants is substantially more difficult (if not downright impossible) than finding it between immigrants from Mexico and the rest of Latin America. With tight resources, it will not be possible for most manufacturers to design programs specifically for individual groups within the Asian population, but at nearly 10% of total population in 2050, those who manage to effectively reach Asians could generate substantial growth.

Children of the future
The number of children will grow less rapidly than the total population, increasing by 39% by 2050 (versus 48% for total population). Although Hispanic and Asian immigrant populations are adding children to the population, the aging non-Hispanic white population is adding very few. All of the projected growth in children will come from new immigrants and their children. Without the children of immigrants (who will have arrived in the U.S. after 2005), the number of children would decrease in absolute numbers over the projection period by about eight million.

Children become more ethnic more quickly than the total population...

More ethnic, more quickly
The net result of the aging non-Hispanic white population, combined with the growth in children coming from new immigrants and their children, is that children become more ethnic more quickly than the total population. As seen below, the share of children who were non-Hispanic white in 1960 will be cut in half by 2050. By 2050, 60% of all children in the U.S. will be Hispanic (35%), black (14%) or Asian (10%). Assuming that Hispanics remain at least somewhat geographically concentrated in the U.S., by 2050, Hispanic children will outnumber non-Hispanic children by a reasonable ratio in many markets in the U.S.

Although there are some differences between the projections done by the Census Bureau and by Pew, there is far more agreement. Unless there is wholesale modification in immigration laws (see sidebar, How Accurate are the Projections), Hispanics and Asians will become more and more important to the overall population of the U.S. over the coming decades. They, and other immigrant groups from sub-Saharan Africa or the Middle East, will account for the vast majority of all population growth that the U.S. will see.

The future U.S. will be a tale of two marketplaces...

A tale of two markets
The future U.S. will be a tale of two marketplaces, one driven by the aging remnants of the Baby Boom, and the other by a wide mix of Latin American and other cultures and languages. The Baby Boom will likely be the most affluent and most active group of seniors the U.S. has ever seen both from a cultural and a political point of view, and certainly the most demanding from a consumer point of view. The growing population though, will be increasingly ethnic—dominantly Hispanic—with an urban-based culture and a very different set of political priorities. They will also dominate the long-held key target market for consumer packaged goods—families with children.

Marketers will need to treat multi-cultural marketing as the norm and not as a side effort. Hispanics will require unique approaches grounded in their own culture and language. The battle at the shelf will be fiercer than ever before, and brands with a true global reach—brands that immigrants will be familiar with before ever stepping foot into a U.S. supermarket—will have a tidy advantage.

Sources:
U.S. Census Bureau (http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/)
PewResearchCenter (http://pewresearch.org/pubs/729/united-states-population-projections)

 
 
 
Delivering consumer clarity
Oct.2008 - Issue 11
In this Issue :
Honey, We Acculturated the Kids!
Welcome Back to the Live Commercial
Out with the Old – In With the New
Private Label: What’s Really Driving Growth?
Brazil – A Happy Place to Live
Below the Topline :

Multi-Cultural Marketing in the U.S.:
Shifting Ethnic Populations

   
  New demographic projections paint a portrait of the future United States as much different from what we see today.

How Accurate Are The Projections?
Any good demographer will say that his or her projections are not attempts to predict the future. They are simulations of possible futures given the current state and a series of assumptions about how things might change. When a demographer provides a series of projections (low/middle/high), he or she is saying that there are several valid ways to think about the assumptions and that we, as consumers of projections, need to consider them carefully and decide which ones are most likely true. As with any other product or service, with demographic projections, it’s caveat emptor.

Today, having even a partial glimpse into the future is a necessity. There seems little doubt that the marketplace even 10 or 20 years into the future will be very different from the marketplace of today. Understanding the implications of future change and laying the groundwork today to deal with tomorrow has to be a high priority for makers and sellers of consumer products. Those who don’t anticipate will be left behind.

Most demographic projections make use of the cohort-component method. Simply, this means that the components of population growth and change are projected independently for a series of cohort groups. Those components include fertility rates (numbers of births), morality rates (numbers of deaths), and net international immigration (the difference in number between those entering the country and those leaving). The cohorts are population groups expected to behave in more or less the same way relative to fertility, mortality, and net immigration rates. Race or ethnic groups, or population groups split by age, are commonly used cohorts.

Mortality
There is extensive data available about when people are most likely to die, and how many people are likely to die at any given age, by race and ethnicity. These time series are used by demographers to estimate life expectancy at birth or life expectancy for various ages. The time series are projected into the future to estimate life expectancy for the entire span of the projections. Most often, increases or decreases in the individual components are pushed closer and closer to average as projection reach further into the future.

Note that most projections today assume gradual increases in life expectancy. There are some new data just coming to light that suggest that obesity rates in the U.S. may have an adverse impact on life expectancy over the coming decades, and therefore will tend to make projections that don’t account for this less accurate. If life expectancies were to start to fall, the main impacts to the projections would be a less rapid aging of the population (since there would be fewer older persons), and even more rapid growth (as a share of population) for Hispanics and other younger ethnic groups.

Fertility
Fertility rates have been dropping globally for the past 35 years, down about 43% since the early 1970s. Projections must make assumptions about how long and to what extent this trend will continue. Most importantly, they must make assumptions about differences in fertility between the cohort groups and between immigrants and ethnic persons born in the U.S. Fortunately, there are many data sources available to help demographers understand changes in fertility.

Immigration
While mortality and fertility rates are by and large not impacted by changes in laws, and mortality minimally affected by cultural shifts (though fertility could be substantially impacted by a change in our culture or the economy), immigration rates can be strongly affected by both. In addition, while immigration is strongly driven by pull factors (the attractiveness of the new country), it is also driven just as strongly — or even more so — by push factors (bad things in your native country you’re trying to get away from). Trying to predict these push factors is nearly impossible. However, given the importance of immigration to future population growth, getting this component of the projections right is key to the process.

The Pew projections use future immigration rates slightly higher than those used by the Census Bureau and the Social Security Administration, but still only project growth in immigrant populations of about 1% a year. This rate is close to, but still somewhat below, the growth trend of the past several decades. So, while the Census Bureau uses a constant immigration rate in the out years, Pew allows the rate to slowly grow. This is a primary reason the Pew projections show a higher incidence of Hispanics in the future than the projections done by the Census Bureau.

Contact Us with Questions or Comments...
 
 
© The Nielsen Company. All rights reserved.  Disclaimer | Privacy Statement